Best 45 quotes of Emanuel Lasker on MyQuotes

Emanuel Lasker

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    An advantage could consist not only in a single important advantage but also in a multitude of insignificant advantages.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    By positional play a master tries to prove and exploit true values, whereas by combinations he seeks to refute false values ... A combination produces an unexpected re-assessment of values.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    By some ardent enthusiasts Chess has been elevated into a science or an art. It is neither; but its principal characteristic seems to be - what human nature mostly delights in - a fight.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    By what right does White, in an absolutely even position, such as after move one, when both sides have advanced 1. e4, sacrifice a pawn, whose recapture is quite uncertain, and open up his kingside to attack? And then follow up this policy by leaving the check of the black queen open? None whatever!

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Chess is, above all, a fight.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Chess is neither a science nor an art. It is what human nature most delights in--a fight.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Do not permit yourself to fall in love with the end-game play to the exclusion of entire games. It is well to have the whole story of how it happened; the complete play, not the denouement only. Do not embrace the rag-time and vaudeville of chess.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Education in Chess has to be an education in independent thinking and judging. Chess must not be memorized.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Having spent 200 hours on the above, the young player, even if he possesses no special talent for chess, is likely to be among those two or three thousand chessplayers [who play on a par with a master]. There are, however, a quarter of a million chessplayers who annually spend no fewer than 200 hours on chess without making any progress. Without going into any further calculations, I can assert with a high degree of certainty that nowadays we achieve only a fraction of what we are capable of achieving.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    He who has a slight disadvantage plays more attentively, inventively and more boldly than his antagonist who either takes it easy or aspires after too much. Thus a slight disadvantage is very frequently seen to convert into a good, solid advantage.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    He who wants to educate himself in Chess must evade what is dead in Chess... the habit of playing with inferior opponents; the custom of avoiding difficult tasks; the weakness of uncritically taking over variations or rules discovered by others; the vanity which is self-sufficient; the incapacity for admitting mistakes; in brief, everything that leas to standstill or to anarchy.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    I believe in magic ... There is magic in the creative faculty such as great poets and philosophers conspicuously possess, and equally in the creative chessmaster.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    If Steinitz continually took pains to discover combinations, the success or failure of his diligent search could not be explained by him as due to chance. Hence, he concluded that some characteristic, a quality of the given position, must exist that would indicate the success or the failure of the search before it was actually undertaken.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    I have added these principles to the law: get the Knights into action before both Bishops are developed

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    I have known many chess players, but among them there has been only one genius - Capablanca!

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    I keep on fighting as long as my opponent can make a mistake.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    In Chess, as it is played by masters, chance is practically eliminated.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    ... in itself the title of world champion does not give any significicant advantages, if it is not acknowledged by the entire chess world, and a champion who does not have the chess world behind him is, in my view, a laughing-stock.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    In mathematics, if I find a new approach to a problem, another mathematician might claim that he has a better, more elegant solution. In chess, if anybody claims he is better than I, I can checkmate him.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Loss generally occurs when a player overrates his advantage or for other reasons seeks to derive from a minute advantage a great return such as a forced win.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Of my fifty-seven years I have applied at least thirty to forgetting most of what I have learned or read. Since then, I have acquired a certain ease and cheer which I should never again like to be without. (...) I have stored little in my memory, but I can apply that little, and it is of use in many and varied emergencies. I keep it in order, but resist every attempt to increase its dead weight.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    On a motif such as was indicated by Reti one cannot build the plan of a whole well contested game; it is too meagre, too thin, too puny for such an end. Reti's explanations, wherever they are concerned with an analysis which covers a few moves, are correct and praiseworthy. But when he abandons the foundations of analysis in order to draw too bold, too general a conclusion, his arguments prove to be mistaken.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    On the chessboard, lies and hypocrisy do not survive long

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    On the chessboard, lies and hypocrisy do not survive long. The creative combination lays bare the presumption of a lie; the merciless fact, culminating in the checkmate, contradicts the hypocrite.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Our efforts in chess attain only a hundredth of one percent of their rightful result... Our education, in all domains of endeavour, is frightfully wasteful of time and values.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Show me three lines of the opening theory moves and I will prove to you that two of them are incorrect.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Show me three variations in the leading handbook on the openings, and I will show you two of those three that are defective.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Steinitz was a thinker worthy of a seat in the halls of a university. A player, as the world believed he was, he was not; his studious temperament made that impossible; and thus he was conquered by a player and in the end little valued by the world, he died.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The attack is that process by means of which you remove obstructions.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The combination player thinks forward; he starts from the given position, and tries the forceful moves in his mind

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The delight in gambits is a sign of chess youth... In very much the same way as the young man, on reaching his manhood years, lays aside the Indian stories and stories of adventure, and turns to the psychological novel, we with maturing experience leave off gambit playing and become interested in the less vivacious but withal more forceful manoeuvres of the position player.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The fatal hour of this ancient game is approaching. In its modern form this game will soon die a drawing death - the inevitable victory of certainty and mechanization will leave its stamp on the fate of chess.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The game gives us a satisfaction that Life denies us. And for the Chess player, the success which crowns his work, the great dispeller of sorrows, is named 'combination'.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The hardest game to win is a won game

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The laws of chess do not permit a free choice: you have to move whether you like it or not.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The most intelligent inspection of any number of fine paintings will not make the observer a painter, nor will listening to a number of operas make the hearer a musician, but good judges of music and painting may so be formed. Chess differs from these. The intelligent perusal of fine games cannot fail to make the reader a better player and a better judge of the play of others.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The process of making pieces in Chess do something useful (whatever it may be) has received a special name: it is called the attack. The attack is that process by means of which you remove obstructions.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    The range of circumstances in which it is possible to presuppose the presence of a combination is very limited. The presence of such circumstances is the reason for the genesis of the idea in the master's brain.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    To find the right plan is just as hard as looking for its sound justification.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    To refer to the oft mooted question, "Which piece is stronger, the Bishop or the Knight?" it is clear that the value of the Bishop undergoes greater changes than that of the Knight.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Truth derives its strength not so much from itself as from the brilliant contrast it makes with what is only apparently true. This applies especially to Chess, where it is often found that the profoundest moves do not much startle the imagination.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Vanity should never tempt a player to engage in a combat at the risk of loss of health. It is bad enough to lose without the additional annoyance of paying doctors' bills.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    When Alekhine recognizes the weakness in his position he has a tendency to become very aggressive. Patient defence is not for him if he can see the slightest chance of creating an attack. Yet sound strategy often demands that you submit to the opponent's will so as to strengthen your weaknesses and get rid of defects in your game.

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    Without error there can be no brilliancy

  • By Anonym
    Emanuel Lasker

    You should keep in mind no names, nor numbers, nor isolated incidents, not even results, but only methods..The method produces numerous results; a few of these will remain in our memory, and as long as they remain few, they are useful to illustrate and to keep alive the rules which order a thousand results.