Best 292 quotes in «global warming quotes» category

It would be incorrect to claim that our paper was an endorsement of CO2-induced global warming.

I used so much hairspray that I feel personally responsible for global warming!

I've often heard it said that there's a consensus of thousands of scientists on the global warming issue and that humans are causing a catastrophic change to the climate system. Well I am one scientist, and there are many that simply think that is not true.

Just because you see an iceberg does not mean that there isn't global warming.

Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers.

Let’s start with the most prominent ecological crisis of our time: global warming. When you look seriously at the numbers, you find that switching from a meat-based to a plant-based diet would do more to curb and reverse global warming than any other initiative.

Let's stop feeling so guilty about global warming

Let the historic dissection begin. Man-made global warming is a dying market and a zombie science.

Mathematics can have its problems, but it's actually hasn't seen a lot of the problems as some of the other sciences and so much of it in what people are doing is completely useless. Nobody kind of in really cares very much. You don't really have kind of right and left and people in ideology coming in because there isn't any. It just doesn't actually connect up to the kinds of things that people ideologically worry about. So most of mathematics just doesn't tell you anything one way or another about global warming or about healthcare or about any number of things that you might care about.

NASA should be at the forefront in the collection of scientific evidence and debunking the current hysteria over human-caused, or Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Unfortunately, it is becoming just another agency caught up in the politics of global warming, or worse, politicized science.

Nancy Pelosi is committed to her global warming fanaticism to the point where she has said she's just trying to save the planet. We all know that someone did that over 2,000 years ago, they saved the planet - we didn't need Nancy Pelosi to do that.

Not only do journalists not have a responsibility to report what skeptical scientists have to say about global warming. They have a responsibility not to report what these scientists say.

Noah had 120 years to warn humanity of the flood. We have only 4-5 years until global warming is irreversible

No matter what Donald Trump says, it's clear that global warming is rapidly changing conditions on our planet.

Non-believers in the greenhouse scenario are in the position of those long ago who doubted the existence of God ... fortunately for them, the Inquisition is no longer with us!

Nothing is more obstinate than a fashionable consensus.

On average, global warming is not going to harm the developing world.

Only by advocating 'politically unrealistic' CO2 concentrations can runaway global warming be avoided. But what is politically realistic for humans is whollymunrelated to what is physically realistic for the planet.

Our nation has both an obligation and self-interest in facing head-on the serious environmental, economic and national security threat posed by global warming.

Our situation, with global warming and air quality and all of that, has gotten to be catastrophic.

Pat Buchanan is so homo-phobic, he blames global warming on the AIDS quilt.

President Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.

I would like nuclear fusion to become a practical power source. It would provide an inexhaustible supply of energy, without pollution or global warming.

Only nuclear power can now halt global warming.

On the environmental front there's concern about global warming and high levels of carbon dioxide, and trees take in CO2 and store carbon.

Personally, I have already turned down the Downing St thermostat by 1 degree

Poor Al Gore, global warming completely debunked, via the very Internet you invented.

President Bush said global warming is happening much quicker than he thought, and then his staff pulled him aside and said 'It's just springtime.'

Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly....As a scientist I remain skeptical.

Scientists have been warning about global warming for decades. It's too late to stop it now, but we can lessen its severity and impacts.

Scientists like Bjorn Lomborg in The Skeptical Environmentalist have, in my opinion, properly nailed environmental extremists for these exaggerated scenarios.

See, I am the mayor of Realville, and science is not up to a vote. It either is or isn't. Whatever it is, it is or isn't, but it's not up to a vote. Global warming doesn't exist because a "consequences of scientists" agree. Manmade global warming either is happening or it isn't, but it isn't up to a vote. But it is being presented to you as a consequences of scientists. Therefore, the science is not settled. Besides that, we all know that it's a hoax now. It's just some people don't want to accept that, but it is.

Several indisputable facts appear evident in geological and climate science that make me a true 'denier' of human-caused global warming.

Society's emissions of carbon dioxide may or may not turn out to have something significant to do with global warming-the jury is still out.

The big thing we are working on now is the global warming hoax. It’s all voodoo, nonsense, hokum, a hoax.

The big damages come if the climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases turns out to be high causing greater global warming than current projections. Then it's not a bullet headed at us, but a thermonuclear warhead.

Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer, but it’s not going to protect you from the coming storm.

The biologists have essentially been pushed aside. Al Gore's just an opportunist. The person who is really responsible for this overestimate of global warming is Jim Hansen. He consistently exaggerates all the dangers.

The G-8 has clearly rejected the failed U.S. policy of voluntary programs to address global warming.

The climate change debate is basically not about science; it is about ideology. It is not about global temperature; it is about the concept of human society. It is not about nature or scientific ecology; it is about environmentalism, about one - recently born - dirigistic and collectivistic ideology, which goes against freedom and free markets.

The climate system is being pushed hard enough that change will become obvious to the man in the street in the next decade.

The conversation on global warming has been stalled because a shrinking group of denialists fly into a rage when it's mentioned.

The interior of the earth is extremely hot – several million degrees.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) new Summary for Policymakers is a political document that downplays assessments of uncertainty from the scientific reports. It omits much contrary evidence. In several cases, it even disagrees with the reports on which it is based.

The Kyoto treaty ... has no scientific foundation

The problem with all these tired excuses for inaction is that it suggests a fundamental lack of faith in American business and American ingenuity.

The only reason runaway global warming seems unstoppable is that we have not yet tried to stop it.

The planet will continue to cook.

There are too many people, that's why we have global warming. We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff.

The proselytisers for man-made global warming have long exercised a tight stranglehold over the contents of Wikipedia.