Best 49 quotes in «intellectual property quotes» category

People have to respect intellectual property.

There is no such thing as intellectual property.

All that we make and do is shaped by the communities and traditions that contain us, not to mention by money, power, politics, and luck. And even should the artist or scientist think she as extracted herself from the world to stand alone in the studio, a tremendous array of faculties and mind-states may well attend her creativity.

A Trade Mark is a company’s persona and identity in the marketplace

A Patent is a Grant, but Inventorship is a Right

Can you think of a better way than slavishly copying and removing attribution to disrespect an author

Copyrights do not and cannot trump publicity rights, they are mutually exclusive

Creative Commons has a lot to offer to the entertainment industry provided it is strategically merged with copyright commercialization strategy

Grant is the beginning of the Patent Game, not its end.

Every Trade Mark you Build adds to the financial value of your business, much more than your tangible assets

Google, you fucking ripped off the iPhone, wholesale ripped us off. Grand theft. I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple’s $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong. I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this. They are scared to death, because they know they are guilty. Outside of Search, Google’s products—Android, Google Docs—are shit. [Steve Jobs]

Ideas in your mind have no patent value. They must be expressed or reduced to practice before it is too late

He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation.

Here’s something to think about: the only thing you really own is what you create. And the only thing you can create without needing someone else to give you the raw materials first… is intellectual property. You can write a book, or draw a picture, or compose some music. Everything else is borrowed. It belonged to someone else before you and it will belong to someone else after you.

Inventors are honorable not because they make a difference, but because they want to make a difference against all odds

Intellectual property, more than ever, is a line drawn around information, which asserts that despite having been set loose in the world - and having, inevitably, been created out of an individual's relationship with the world - that information retains some connection with its author that allows that person some control over how it is replicated and used. In other words, the claim that lies beneath the notion of intellectual property is similar or identical to the one that underpins notions of privacy. It seems to me that the two are inseparable, because they are fundamentally aspects of the same issue, the need we have to be able to do something by convention that is impossible by force: the need to ringfence certain information. I believe that the most important unexamined notion - for policymakers and agitators both - in these debates is that they are one: you can't persuade people on the one hand to abandon intellectual property (a decision which, incidentally, would mean an even more massive upheaval in the way the world runs than we've seen so far since 1990) and hope to keep them interested in privacy. You can't trash privacy and hope to retain a sense of respect for IP.

Inventions cannot be judged on patent parameters, but patents have the ability to take inventions very far

India's IP policy reflects the confusion in the minds of the policymakers .

Inventors do not invent for financial gain, they invent simply because they love to invent

Keep in mind that in the whole long tradition of storytelling, from Greek myths through Shakespeare through King Arthur and Robin Hood, this whole notion that you can't tell stories about certain characters because someone else owns them is a very modern one - and to my mind, a very strange one.

Moral rights form the essence of copyright law. When they conflict with economic rights, moral rights must always prevent

Patent Law cannot afford to sit and watch while technology advancement changes its dynamics

Patents are not forever, but inventions are

Patents stand for you when everything else is lost

Patents do not promote progress of science and technology, Inventors do.

Most patentability requirements are concepts, they can be moulded to suit your invention

Patent Validity is a figment of legal interpretation, it can be contested, reversed and cancelled any time before expiry

Patents need inventors more than inventors need patents

The history of patents includes a wealth of attempts to reward friends of the government and restrict or control dangerous technologies.

Promotion and Popularity through Piracy are now main stream. May be, it is time for content owners to have a piracy plan for a part of their content to gain visibility and popularity before capitalizing on the rest

Representations that do not make sense are the best Trade Marks

Risk of patent infringement is relative, often wrapped and presented in absolute terms

Quality IP comes from Quality effort.

The precursor of copyright law served to force the identification of the author so that he could be punished if he proved to be a heretic or a revolutionary

The past folds accordion-like into the present. Different media have different event horizons—for the written word, three millennia; for recorded sound, a century and a half—and within their time frames the old becomes as accessible as the new. Yellowed newspapers come back to life. Under headings of 50 Years Ago and 100 Years Ago, veteran publications recycle their archives: recipes, card-play techniques, science, gossip, once out of print and now ready for use. Record companies rummage through their attics to release, or re-release, every scrap of music, rarities, B-sides, and bootlegs. For a certain time, collectors, scholars, or fans possessed their books and their records. There was a line between what they had and what they did not. For some, the music they owned (or the books, or the videos) became part of who they were. That line fades away. Most of Sophocles' plays are lost, but those that survive are available at the touch of a button. Most of Bach's music was unknown to Beethoven; we have it all—partitas, cantatas, and ringtones. It comes to us instantly, or at light speed. It is a symptom of omniscience. It is what the critic Alex Ross calls the Infinite Playlist, and he sees how mixed is the blessing: "anxiety in place of fulfillment, and addictive cycle of craving and malaise. No sooner has one experience begun than the thought of what else is out there intrudes." The embarrassment of riches. Another reminder that information is not knowledge, and knowledge is not wisdom.

The right to be attributed as an author of a work is not merely a copyright, it is every author’s basic human right

There is nothing called as cheap patents. Anything cheap is not worthwhile.

True inventors do not sit on their inventions

The strength of a patent doesn’t come from its claims, it comes from the invention

To take a stand on IP, India needs to have a stand first.

Respect for inventors is the key for success of a patent system

To achieve patent commercialization success, every inventor must think like a business man

You can derive value from the Indian patent system, provided you know how it works. Stop cribbing about how it is not like another country’s system, and start thinking about how you can gain business value

We are born rich, it is for us to decide between materialistic poorness or building upon intellectual richness.

We live in a world where value of creativity is measured by commercial success, and copyrights are mere instruments of financial benefit, not creative progress

We love patents, but not unconditionally; We believe in patents, but not mindlessly; We value patents, but not at the cost of our core values; and We are serious about patents, but saving life always comes first

Working a Patent is not as easy as it sounds

When God Almighty blogs, then I blog, I put to writing what he says at any time and at any place. May God our Father bless the internet and all social media and public publishing platforms in the name of Jesus Christ. Through these Social Media and healing platforms, the Lord God Almighty has brought the message of healing, cleansing, protection, salvation and peace, ability and stability, joy and happiness, justice and peace to all people without bias....Father God, the Lord God Almighty says this to all his vessels he uses for his glory and honour, "You rise above in greatness for I am with you and in you. I will lift you up to the greatest heights, for you are mine all you innovative entities and people.

You cannot make one invent at gun point. Forget the movies, and think about pampering inventors, not threatening them