Best 544 quotes in «nuclear quotes» category

I don't like the word nuclear exchange, it's like an exchange of wheat and so on. It's a horrible term and I always cross it out when I see it somewhere.

I don't think that the United States cares. They just assume that North Korea will soon have nuclear weapons.

I do want to be very clear: I see our nuclear deterrent as absolutely core insurance for our national security.

If ants had nuclear weapons, they would probably end the world in a week.

If anyone wants a hole in the ground, nuclear explosives can make big holes

If a power station were to be built down the road, I'd prefer a nuclear plant over an oil burner, and definitely over a coal burner. We simply have to lessen our consumption of fossil fuels.

I feel like a nuclear missile. Point me in that direction, I'll go.

If I thought there was some reason to be concerned about them, I wouldn't be sleeping in this house tonight. (When asked about continued presence of Soviet nuclear submarines along US coastlines)

If nuclear warfare is believed to be somewhat controlled, then climate change is now the greatest threat.

If some nuclear properties of the heavy elements had been a little different from what they turned out to be, it might have been impossible to build a bomb.

If the nuclear program is indeed meant only for civil purposes, then it is wrong to impose sanctions.

If the North Korean side shows no sincerity in solving the nuclear weapon, abduction and missile issues, then the likelihood of normalization of diplomatic relations is very slim.

If we are really anxious not to have nuclear weapons in Iran, the first thing is to call an international conference on abolishing all nuclear weapons, including Israeli nuclear weapons.

If we conceive all the changes in the physical world as reducible to the motion of atoms, motions generated by means of the fixed nuclear forces of those atoms, the whole of the world could thus be known by means of the natural sciences.

If we dont continue to pursue alternative, emissions-free energy sources like nuclear fuel, we are at risk of increasing our dependence on costly natural gas.

If you're gonna sit there and be worried about what Donald Trump would do with nuclear weapons, you've got to know that it's Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton who have made it possible for Iran to nuke up, and that's in nobody's best interests. That's not in the best interests of our ally, Israel. It's not in the best interests of ourselves.

I hate people. People make me pro-nuclear.

I feel relieved that we discovered that Iraq did not have nuclear weapons.

If in the words which the Secretary of State has just used, the use of a nuclear weapon is to be avoided 'at all costs'. what is the point of having one?

If nuclear energy is used for the sake of humanity, then I say yes. But if it is used destructively, then no.

If the greenhouse effect is a blanket in which we wrap ourselves to keep warm, nuclear winter kicks the blanket off.

If the nuclear dossier is referred to the U. N. Security Council, Iran will have to resume uranium enrichment.

If there was a market in mass-produced portable nuclear weapons, we'd market them, too.

If the Russian nuclear arsenal was fired at the United States and other targets, and we fired back at them with thousands of nuclear weapons, it would be the end of life on earth.

If we had adhered to the concept of connectedness, then we would not have created nuclear weapons, huge armies and global warming.

If world is suspicious that Israel may detonate nuclear bomb and if the suspicion is a deterrent - that's good enough.

If you don't believe ... Saddam Hussein is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn't vote for me.

If you start getting instability in large powers with nuclear weapons, that's not a good day.

I have hope for the world, although it is ten minutes before Doomsday. Women all over the world are rising up and infusing the anti-nuclear and peace movements with a vitality and creativity never seen before.

I have said publicly no option should be off the table, but I would certainly take nuclear weapons off the table.

I have to say that, you know, for what Secretary [Hillary] Clinton was saying about nuclear with Russia, she's very cavalier in the way she talks about various countries. But Russia has been expanding their - they have a much newer capability than we do. We have not been updating from the new standpoint.

I made a nuclear reactor when I was 14

I'm afraid there's a big confusion in the world between nuclear power and nuclear arms.

I mean science was blamed for all the horrors of World War I, just as it's blamed today for nuclear weapons and quite rightly.

Impulsiveness is not a trait one would choose for a person with the power to launch the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

I'm worried about the world because of nuclear proliferation.

In 1947 I defended my thesis on nuclear physics, and in 1948 I was included in a group of research scientists whose task was to develop nuclear weapons.

In a nuclear age, each of us is threatened when peace is not secured everywhere.

In contrast to my husband, I can pronounce the word nuclear.

Indeed, the whole human species is endangered, by nuclear weapons or by other means of wholesale destruction which further advances in science are likely to produce.

Indeed, the very first resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations - adopted unanimously - called for the elimination of nuclear weapons.

India, in particular, is looking to develop nuclear power for domestic, commercial use, and we should work with them. This is a good deal for both countries.

India can live without nuclear weapons. That's our dream, and it should be the dream of the U.S. also.

Individual scientists like myself - and many more conspicuous - pointed to the dangers of radioactive fallout over Canada if we were to launch nuclear weapons to intercept incoming bombers.

I never turn on the news over the weekend, short of a nuclear detonation somewhere. I just don't. I don't learn anything from it anymore.

In fact, [Donald's Trump] cavalier attitude about nuclear weapons is so deeply troubling.

In my humble opinion, in the nuclear world, the true enemy is war itself.

I not only saw the possibility of nuclear war, I feared it very much. If they started a military conflagration, it would automatically lead to nuclear warfare.

In our age of nuclear and biological weapons and the ever more efficient exploitation of nature, the mix of high technology and an ethos of domination could take us to an evolutionary dead end.

In plain words: now that Britain has told the world that she has the H-Bomb she should announce as early as possible that she has done with it, that she proposes to reject in all circumstances nuclear warfare.