Best 2024 quotes in «violence quotes» category

Humour is like violence. They both come to you unexpectedly, and the more unpredictable they both are, the better it gets.

I ain't the type for begging, I am not the type to plead. If she don't change those evil ways, I'm gonna make her bleed.

I also think that one of the things we often fail to realize is that that kind of violence is now legitimated in multiple public spheres.

I always thought the real violence in Hollywood isn't what's on the screen. It's what you have to do to raise the money.

I am, after all, a thriller writer. I routinely delve into the darkest chambers of the human heart. I've written about murder, kidnapping, depravity, horror, violence, and disfigurement.

I am a survivor of domestic violence.

I am committed to the principle that violence is never justified as a means of ameliorating a grievance.

I am in a charity out there to stop violence against women.

I am much more open about categories of gender, and my feminism has been about women's safety from violence, increased literacy, decreased poverty and more equality.

I am obliged to renounce violence, and abstain from it altogether.

I am willing to accept that there are women out there who say they have chosen to sell sex. But they are in the minority, and laws are there to protect the majority. In this case, the majority of women in prostitution want to get out, and suffer violence and exploitation. If there are women who have made a free choice, there are more who have had no choice.

I argued constantly with my father [Pablo Escobar] because I never liked all the violence that he created.

I believe humor nullifies violence.

I can think of films that I'm producing right now that are extremely hard-hitting, graphic films, that nobody necessarily wants to see, graphic in terms of violence, of adult content and racial and historical subject matter.

I cannot teach you violence, as I do not myself believe in it. I can only teach you not to bow your heads before any one even at the cost of your life.

I cannot speak adequately, especially considering my race and my privilege, to the violence of the NYPD or the police in racial terms. That is something that I cannot speak adequately to.

I can't remember any text of mine where I said that one should fight Hitler without violence; I'm not an idiot.

I condemn, for all climes and for all times, secret murders and unfair methods even for a fair cause.

I did not begin to talk about peace when my father died nor did I begin to criticize him at that point - I did this when I had him in front of me, I was one of his harshest criticizers and I never applauded his violence.

I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed, without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today – my own government.

I denounced Donald Trump for not denouncing the kind of vitriol, the kind of violence that he has perpetrated with his angry rhetoric. And he knows exactly what he's doing. This is not the Donald Trump who denounced David Duke in 1991. This is a guy who's now soaking up this hate and his spilling it back out.

I did not mean to argue that gender is fluid and changeable (mine certainly is not). I only meant to say that we should all have greater freedoms to define and pursue our lives without pathologization, de-realization, harassment, threats of violence, violence, and criminalization. I join in the struggle to realize such a world.

I did not enjoy the violence of boxing so much as the science of it. I was intrigued by how one moved one's body to protect oneself, how one used a strategy both to attack and retreat, how one paced oneself over a match.

I distrust the incommunicable; it is the source of all violence

I do fear that global capitalism is making us more like each other in regrettable ways, e.g., more people are increasingly captivated by spectacles of violence and aggression or of conspicuous consumption that are the subjects of the most commercially viable films across countries precisely because they don't depend for their appeal on cultural fine points; and more people are prone to deal with others on a purely instrumental and impersonal basis.

I do have an intense respect for pacifists, because I believe that ultimately, if we are to have a truly humanistic as well as libertarian society, violence will have to be banished on this planet.

I do consider the human capacity for violence is the central issue of the social contract. In boxing we have a peculiarly civilized form, in that boxers don't screech and holler. They don't use weapons. All of this seems to me quite amazing, because it is so disciplined, so controlled. It's ritualized, but absolutely genuine. And the cultural structure built around that ritual is absolutely fascinating to me. And it seems to me that boxing is one of those structures that is designed to promote harmony. I think that it is a stove that contains that fire in us and makes it safe and useful.

I do not believe in terrorism, violence, destruction, murder, pre-emption, or War.

I do not know what it was about that boy but just looking at him, even I wanted to clout him on the head. It was a head that invited violence.

I do not hold to non-violence for moral reasons, but for political and practical reasons.

I do not want to live at the cost of the life even of a snake. I should let him bite me to death rather than kill him.

I do not regard killing or assassination or terrorism as good in any circumstances whatsoever.

I don't advocate senseless violence of any human being. I'm the one who's been beat down. But I will not be a victim again.

I don't advocate violence; but if a man steps on my toes, I'll step on his.

I don't ever believe in violence as a kind of medicine.

I don't feel comfortable with violence, and I'm not sure that I film violent scenes properly, and it's something I'm reticent to do, and yet violence is sort of in all of my films.

I don't initiate violence, I retaliate.

I don't like gratuitous violence. I don't like the 'Saw' movies. I don't like the 'Hostel' movies. I don't like anything that is violence for violence's sake.

I'd seen too many shrines in South Central and thought it was worth asking where the first bullet came from that started all this violence.

I don't mean to romanticise the struggle, that leads to all kinds of terrible violence and absurdities that are even worse than the perverse immediate gratification.

I don't think movies are the reason why this violence exists, I think it's going to happen whether movies are there or not.

I don't like to go to the movies to see violence or some kind of spy thing with all kinds of information you have to assimilate to understand the plot.

I don't require movies to be about good people, and I don't reject screen violence.

I don't think that movies are too violent. But I do think that popcorn is too expensive, and this can often lead to violence.

I express preference for a chronological sequence of events which precludes a violence.

If a movie isn't a hit right out of the gate, they drop it. Which means that the whole mainstream Hollywood product has been skewed toward violence and vulgar teen comedy.

If a man is not peaceful and non-violent, whichever religion he belongs to, he is not a man! Violence degrades man to a low-degree creature!

I feel perhaps I didn't deal with the question of violence in depth.

If I do not respond to some situation, my conscience kills me. I believe in permissible violence, not necessarily non-violence.

If I had a large amount of money I should certainly found a hospital for those whose grip upon the world is so tenuous that they can be severely offended by words and phrases and yet remain all unoffended by the injustice, violence and oppression that howls daily about our ears.