Best 47 quotes of Clifford Geertz on MyQuotes

Anthropology in general has always been fairly hospitable to female scholars, and even to feminist scholars

Anthropology never has had a distinct subject matter, and because it doesn't have a real method, there's a great deal of anxiety over what it is

A religion is a system of symbols which acts to establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods in men by formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and clothing those conceptions with such an aura of factuality that the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic.

As a religious problem, the problem of suffering is, paradoxically, not how to avoid suffering but how to suffer, how to make of physical pain, personal loss, worldly defeat, or the helpless contemplation of others' agony something bearable, supportable- something as we say, sufferable.

Believing, with Max Weber, that man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun, I take culture to be those webs, and the analysis of it to be therefore not an experimental science in search of law but an interpretive one in search of meaning.

[Culture] denotes an historically transmitted pattern of meanings embodied in symbols, a system of inherited conceptions expressed in symbolic forms, by means of which men communicate, perpetuate, and develop their knowledge about and attitudes toward life.

Has feminism made us all more conscious? I think it has. Feminist critiques of anthropological masculine bias have been quite important, and they have increased my sensitivity to that kind of issue

I agree with Chomsky in almost nothing. When it comes to innate structures and so on, I'm very skeptical

I don't feel that an atmosphere of debate and total disagreement and argument is such a bad thing. It makes for a vital and alive field.

I don't have the notion that everybody has to write in some single academic style

I don't think things are moving toward an omega point; I think they're moving toward more diversity

I don't write drafts. I write from the beginning to the end, and when it's finished, it's done

I do think the attempt to raise consciousness has succeeded. People are very aware of gender concerns now

If I remember correctly, a writer is someone who wants to convey information. Language or writing is a code

If there's ever a place where you can't argue that you can put the facts over here and the text over there and see if they fit, it is surely in anthropology

I had a hard time convincing students that they were going to North Africa to understand the North Africans, not to understand themselves.

I have a social philosophy; you have political opinions; he has an ideology.

I'm an inveterate fox and not a hedgehog, so I always think you should try everything

I'm writing a review of three books on feminism and science, and it's about social constructionism. So I would say I'm a social constructionist, whatever that means

I never leave a sentence or a paragraph until I'm satisfied with it

I think of myself as a writer who happens to be doing his writing as an anthropologist

I think feminism has had a major impact on anthropology

I think the American university system still seems to be the best system in the world

I think the perception of there being a deep gulf between science and the humanities is false

I think what's known about neurology is still scattered and uncertain

It may be in the cultural particularities of people — in their oddities — that some of the most instructive revelations of what it is to be generically human are to be found.

It's always amusing to look at how something early in the 20th century was written in anthropology and how it's written now. There's been an enormous shift in how it's done, but yet you can't put your finger on someone who actually did it

I've often been accused of making anthropology into literature, but anthropology is also field research. Writing is central to it.

I've written a lot of books which are written from the moon - the view from nowhere.

I was trained in the '50s as a New Critic. I remember what literature was like before the New Critics, when people stood up and talked about Shelley's soul and such things

Learning to exist in a world quite different from that which formed you is the condition, these days, of pursuing research you can on balance believe in and write sentences you can more or less live with.

Man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun.

My instincts are always against people who want to fasten some sort of hegemony onto things

One of the most significant facts about humanity may finally be that we all begin with the natural equipment to a live a thousand kinds of life but end in the end having lived only one

People keep asking how anthropology is different from sociology, and everybody gets nervous.

The North African mule talks always of his mother's brother, the horse, but never of his father, the donkey, in favor of others supposedly more reputable.

The point of literary criticism in anthropology is not to replace research, but to find out how it is that we are persuasive.

There is an Indian story -- at least I heard it as an Indian story -- about an Englishman who, having been told that the world rested on a platform which rested on the back of an elephant which rested in turn on the back of a turtle, asked (perhaps he was an ethnographer; it is the way they behave), what did the turtle rest on? Another turtle. And that turtle? 'Ah, Sahib, after that it is turtles all the way down

The way in which mathematicians and physicists and historians talk is quite different, and what a physicist means by physical intuition and what a mathematician means by beauty or elegance are things worth thinking about.

To see ourselves as others see us can be eye-opening. To see others as sharing a nature with ourselves is the merest decency. But it is from the far more difficult achievement of seeing ourselves amongst others, as a local example of the forms human life has locally taken, a case among cases, a world among worlds, that the largeness of mind, without which objectivity is self-congratulation and tolerance a sham, comes.

Understanding a people's culture exposes their normalness without reducing their particularity...It renders them accessible: setting them in the frame of their own banalities, it dissolves their opacity.

What we call our data are really our own constructions of other people’s constructions of what they and their compatriots are up to.

Younger anthropologists have the notion that anthropology is too diverse. The number of things done under the name of anthropology is just infinite; you can do anything and call it anthropology

If we wanted home truths, we should have stayed at home.

if you want to understand what a science is, you should look in the first in­stance not at its theories or its findings, and certainly not at what its apologists say about it; you should look at what the practitioners of it do.

The notion that someone who does not hold your views holds the reciprocal of them, or simply hasn't got any, has, whatever its comforts for those afraid reality is going to go away unless we believe very hard in it, not conduced to much in the way of clarity in the anti-relativist discussion, but merely to far too many people spending far too much time describing at length what it is they do not maintain than seems in any way profitable.

What we had actually demonstrated was our cowardice, but there is fellowship in that too.