Best 393 quotes in «digital quotes» category

It's a battle between record company, between producer and between mastering engineer. Because the louder you make your record in a digital process, the more dynamics are squished out of it. Nobody knows exactly what happens, but the dynamics in the performance disappear, and everything is at the same volume.

It’s not about revenues: the fundamental economics in digital business is scale and margins. The top line has become the bottom line.

It seems that film-makers are being divided between those working in digital and those who are not. I think it's not something predetermined - it all depends on what project we have in mind, and on that basis we choose the medium.

It's not plagiarism in the digital age -- it's repurposing.

It's easy to make a pirate copy when you have digital tapes of things. And it was so complicated and complex to go through all the post-production of a movie without ever going digital.

It's not about being digital. It's about students who are born digital.

It's not so much a question of whether we've shot it through 35mm or digital video; what is important is whether the audience accepts it as real.

It was an interesting question as to whether the BBC had a future in the digital world, and what form of market failure could justify the licence fee system.

It was a huge challenge to learn digital painting well enough so that computers don't pop into mind when one sees one.

I used to work for 12 or 14 hours at a time but the digital age has made such happy immersions almost impossible.

I've created a narrative of the world. I live in the world - tenuously, most times. I've avoided the digital world.

It's pointless to go against digital because sooner or later you won't be able to do anything else.

I've been making the recordings for a long time, and I have tons and tons of them. I'm like a digital hoarder or something - everything is on like hard drives and whatever.

I've got a new studio set up very much based around live mixing and also mixing analogue and digital systems. Inspired by the late King Tubby and Scientist.

I've had the luxury of owning my own studio, 24 analogue, 48 digital, endless effects, endless hardcore gear, that I don't have to rent, I don't get stuck with the bills, it's all mine.

I’ve noticed that the people who started on film still have the ability to see the person in front of them. Whereas for a lot of photographers who have only ever worked in digital, the relationship between the photographer and the person who they’re taking a picture of sort of doesn’t exist anymore. They’re looking at a computer screen as opposed to the person.

I was involved in the color correction and the digital color correction. In an odd way, you end up making a film many times-the DVD, the archival record of a high-definition master, and so on.

Just a little bit of exposure to this pulsed digital signal, which is now a cellphone signal, could weaken membranes of the brain.

I was shooting lots of large format portraits then but I've since changed to digital, where you have so much more control. There are millions of things you can do with digital; you can be more spontaneous, and you're more in control of your color palette.

Many Americans have never owned a book, and I'm not talking about because of the recent digital revolution. I'm talking about before there even was a digital revolution.

I will always prefer a hardback book, but I'm drawn to digital because it's so easy to acquire them when I'm having a need-to-read moment.

Millions and millions of exuberant monkeys are creating an endless digital forest of mediocrity.

Millennials expect to create a better future, using the collaborative power of digital technology.

Most of my work involves slowing down rather than speeding up. I prefer to look at prints than scans, and I prefer to look at original silver prints rather than digital prints. I prefer to look at fewer images, but spend time with those individual images.

Marketers need to build digital relationships and reputation before closing a sale.

Movie distribution may very well have migrated fully to digital form by then, making a huge dent in the need to print film and physically distribute content.

Much to the surprise of the builders of the first digital computers, programs written for them usually did not work.

My problem has been with purely digital films. I feel the danger there is that the kind of short-cuts you end up having to take are the ones that are most telling in the main characters.

My background is in like short form digital media, I call myself more of a digital filmmaker than anything else.

No more do we create cultural artifacts that are simply our furniture, but now it's our thoughts, our values, are embodied in this [digital] stuff.

My protest against digital has been me saying, "What's going to happen to film?" The result is that Kodak is out of business. That's a national tragedy. We've got to keep making film.

No matter how great we get with digital formats of instrumentation, nothing really quite duplicates the real thing

No place in the US better exemplifies the ethos to engineer new digital technologies than Silicon Valley

My ears won't fool me. Even when I do a session on digital, we still warm it up somewhere in the process, in mastering or mixing, running the signal through some tubes somewhere.

Once the image was in the digital environment, one of the problems was, we had no means to reproduce the color spectrum, grey scale, and contrast that film produces, without converting the digital file to film, evaluating it, then going back and changing the digital image.

One paradox I have found is that, the more you use computers in picture-making, the more hand-made the picture becomes. Oddly, then, digital technology is leading, in my work at least, toward a greater reliance on handmaking because the assembly and montage of the various parts of the picture is done very carefully by hand.

One of the things that I've been doing recently in my scientific research is to ask this question: Is the universe actually capable of performing things like digital computations?

One of the Internet's strengths is its ability to help consumers find the right needle in a digital haystack of data.

One thing that has happened is a revolution in digital consumer recording, and overall, that's a great thing for art, but parallel to that there's been a revolution in boutique audio companies making excellent gear.

Our demographic dividend must get the digital strength.

Paper remains the standard to which digital media can only aspire.

Overloading attention shrinks mental control. Life immersed in digital distractions creates a near constant cognitive overload. And that overload wears out self-control.

People care about our digital revenue, not our print revenue.

People of all demographic categories and geographic regions will access a good digital library.

Our Digital Immigrant instructors, who speak an outdated language (that of the pre-digital age), are struggling to teach a population that speaks an entirely new language

People are so into digital recording now they forgot how easy analog recording can be.

People think they own time. They have watches and clocks and digital pulses. But they are wrong. Time owns them.

People think that digital language is a fixed language, but it's not: it's very fluid. It's like I'm doing a painting where the paint refuses to dry.

Sharing is good, and with digital technology, sharing is easy.

Real film is light; digital is electricity.